Encouraging Employees to Solve Problems (Part 2)

Cathie Leimbach • April 5, 2022

When employees solve many of their day-to-day workplace problems there are several benefits:

·        They feel good about themselves and their abilities.

·        They can get through the problem and on with their next task even when their supervisor or a colleague aren’t available to help them.

·        Their supervisor has time to help other employees and work on more strategic tasks.

·        Employee self-esteem, satisfaction, and morale increase.

·        Productivity and bottom-line results increase, improving the mission impact and the sustainability of the organization.

 

Despite these benefits, in many organizations the managers solve more problems than do the employees. There are two primary factors that underlie this inefficient and often ineffective reality. Managers may believe their job is to be the star decision-maker and the primary source of information and ideas so they, consciously or unconsciously, make it uncomfortable for employees to solve problems. Managers may discourage employees by regularly telling others how they would have done it differently, by micromanaging employees’ every move, or by not thanking employees for taking the initiative even when their approach achieved the desired results. Or, employees may not have the knowledge or skills needed to solve problems. The Part 1 article focused on how the manager can create a workplace environment that empowers employee decision making. This article, Part 2, shares how managers can help employees develop the ability and confidence to solve problems.

 

5 Ways Leaders Can Encourage Employees to Solve Problems

 

1.     Define the Problem

Be clear about what the problem is. What result are you trying to achieve that you are not getting? At what step in the process is the problem occurring.

 

2.     Describe the Situation

What actions or events led to the problem? What were the conditions in which the problem occurred? What other problems were encountered in tandem with this problem?

 

3.     Determine the Root Cause

What factors caused the problem? Was the machine inadequately maintained or broken? Were the people doing the work in too much of a hurry or not focused on their work? Did the people not understand what was expected of them or not provided adequate training?  Were too few people assigned to the task or were the necessary tools not available? The purpose here is not to blame someone for creating the problem, but rather to be clear about the primary causes of the problem so they can be addressed to avoid or reduce the problem in the future.  

 

4.     Identify Potential Solutions

Quickly brainstorm actions that might be taken to address each factor that contributed to the problem. At this stage record all possibilities, whether they are practical in your situation or not. Sometimes what doesn’t seem feasible in the short run, is the best option. By discussing all possible solutions, we often figure out a way to make a new idea work.

 

5.     Choose and Implement the Best Solution

Consider the pros and cons of each potential solution. Select the one that is most likely to work for you. Quickly determine the steps and timeline for implementing the solution and put your plan into action.

 

Having a clear process for solving problems helps both leaders and employees develop effective problem-solving skills. And when the purpose of identifying the cause of the problems is to assist in solving the problem, not to blame the people who were involved, everyone is more willing to address concerns that move the organization forward.   

Speaking Up Is Not Defiance. It's Duty.

By Cathie Leimbach • June 23, 2026
Most leaders say they want employees to speak up. They want people who spot risks, question assumptions, and help the organization make better decisions. Yet many employees hesitate to do exactly that. Why? Because leaders often respond to speaking up as if the speaker is complaining, criticizing or resisting. When people fear being viewed as difficult, they stop sharing what they see. The organization loses valuable information, ideas, and perspectives. A recent McKinsey article found that teams with high psychological safety are two to three times more likely to generate breakthrough ideas. When people feel safe speaking up, better thinking follows. The best leaders understand a simple truth: Speaking up is not defiance. It's duty. When employees question assumptions, raise concerns, or offer a different perspective, they are helping the team avoid blind spots and make stronger decisions. That's why effective leaders don't merely tolerate speaking up—they invite it. They ask: What are we not seeing? What assumptions are we making? Who might see this differently? What information are we missing? Just as importantly, they respond with curiosity instead of defensiveness. They thank people for expressing their perspective. They explain how input influenced decisions. They make speaking up safe. Because organizations don't improve when everyone agrees. They improve when people feel responsible for helping the team see what others may have missed. In healthy organizations, speaking up isn't rebellion. It's responsibility. It's duty. Leadership Reflection Think about your last leadership team meeting. Did people simply agree? Or did someone help the team see something it otherwise would have missed? Download 5 Questions That Surface Better Thinking and make speaking up a productive part of how your team thinks, decides, and performs.

Put Your Brain in Gear When Using AI

By Cathie Leimbach • June 16, 2026
Artificial Intelligence is becoming a powerful workplace tool. It can summarize information, analyze data, draft content, and generate ideas in seconds. But there is a growing risk leaders need to recognize: AI can sound convincing even when it is wrong. In an article by Erica Dhawan, she describes a legal case where attorneys used ChatGPT to help prepare a court filing. The brief looked professional, the reasoning seemed logical, and the citations appeared legitimate. There was only one problem: several of the cited cases did not exist. The AI had fabricated them. The danger wasn't carelessness. It was trust. Because the information was presented clearly, confidently, and professionally, nobody stopped to question it. Psychologists call this the "fluency heuristic"—our tendency to assume information is accurate when it is easy to process and sounds credible. As leaders, we cannot allow polished answers to replace critical thinking. When you find yourself thinking, "This is too good to be true," put your brain in gear. Dig deeper. Investigate. Verify the facts. Ask what assumptions were made, what information might be missing, and what evidence supports the conclusion. AI can be an incredible assistant. It should never become a substitute for judgment. The smooth answer is not always the wrong one—but it is often the one that deserves the most scrutiny. Before You Act, Verify. The biggest risk with AI isn't bad information. It's believable information that's wrong. That's why we created the AI Verification Checklist for Leaders —a simple 5-minute tool designed to help leaders challenge assumptions, identify missing information, verify conclusions, and make better decisions before acting on AI-generated recommendations. Download the free AI Verification Checklist for Leaders and start asking better questions before making important decisions.