Who's Responsible for Employee Success?
Cathie Leimbach • July 15, 2020
This is a subtitle for your new post
When I facilitate client meetings, every person in the room shares their perspective on the matter at hand and contributes ideas of how to move forward. Managers are often shocked at the positive energy and quality of input from their staff. Why are so many leaders, managers, and supervisors unaware of their staff’s potential and their value to the organization?
One reason is that few managers ask questions. There is a tendency for supervisors to give their staff day-by-day, or even hour-by-hour, specific instructions on what to do next, or they leave their staff alone to figure everything out by themselves. Few managers invest a lot of time using an intermediate approach. Daily or weekly two-way conversations between staff members and supervisors are relatively uncommon. Without such discussions, supervisors are unaware of their staff’s strengths and interests so can’t leverage their potential.
And, when staff don’t interact with others at work, they don’t feel valued. Their enthusiasm and productivity drop. Then, managers get frustrated with employee apathy and mediocre productivity.
Leaders push staff to work harder. Staff complain that managers aren't helpful or expectations aren't clear. Decades of Gallup research has revealed that the staff's assessment of the problem is pretty accurate. 70% of the factors that contribute to disappointing morale, engagement, productivity, and profit are the responsibility of managers.
So, what is the root cause of mediocre organizational outcomes? IT’S THE MANAGER!
Effective managers have servant hearts. They develop the skills needed to help their staff be the best they can be. They manage by asking questions that inspire great conversations and by becoming competent in the fifteen core skills of effective management. Unfortunately, this description of an effective manager does not describe the majority of managers.
What will you do this week to move beyond average? What is your next step to becoming a manager who leads with excellence and develops a healthy, high performance workplace team?
Most leaders say they want employees to speak up. They want people who spot risks, question assumptions, and help the organization make better decisions. Yet many employees hesitate to do exactly that. Why? Because leaders often respond to speaking up as if the speaker is complaining, criticizing or resisting. When people fear being viewed as difficult, they stop sharing what they see. The organization loses valuable information, ideas, and perspectives. A recent McKinsey article found that teams with high psychological safety are two to three times more likely to generate breakthrough ideas. When people feel safe speaking up, better thinking follows. The best leaders understand a simple truth: Speaking up is not defiance. It's duty. When employees question assumptions, raise concerns, or offer a different perspective, they are helping the team avoid blind spots and make stronger decisions. That's why effective leaders don't merely tolerate speaking up—they invite it. They ask: What are we not seeing? What assumptions are we making? Who might see this differently? What information are we missing? Just as importantly, they respond with curiosity instead of defensiveness. They thank people for expressing their perspective. They explain how input influenced decisions. They make speaking up safe. Because organizations don't improve when everyone agrees. They improve when people feel responsible for helping the team see what others may have missed. In healthy organizations, speaking up isn't rebellion. It's responsibility. It's duty. Leadership Reflection Think about your last leadership team meeting. Did people simply agree? Or did someone help the team see something it otherwise would have missed? Download 5 Questions That Surface Better Thinking and make speaking up a productive part of how your team thinks, decides, and performs.
Artificial Intelligence is becoming a powerful workplace tool. It can summarize information, analyze data, draft content, and generate ideas in seconds. But there is a growing risk leaders need to recognize: AI can sound convincing even when it is wrong. In an article by Erica Dhawan, she describes a legal case where attorneys used ChatGPT to help prepare a court filing. The brief looked professional, the reasoning seemed logical, and the citations appeared legitimate. There was only one problem: several of the cited cases did not exist. The AI had fabricated them. The danger wasn't carelessness. It was trust. Because the information was presented clearly, confidently, and professionally, nobody stopped to question it. Psychologists call this the "fluency heuristic"—our tendency to assume information is accurate when it is easy to process and sounds credible. As leaders, we cannot allow polished answers to replace critical thinking. When you find yourself thinking, "This is too good to be true," put your brain in gear. Dig deeper. Investigate. Verify the facts. Ask what assumptions were made, what information might be missing, and what evidence supports the conclusion. AI can be an incredible assistant. It should never become a substitute for judgment. The smooth answer is not always the wrong one—but it is often the one that deserves the most scrutiny. Before You Act, Verify. The biggest risk with AI isn't bad information. It's believable information that's wrong. That's why we created the AI Verification Checklist for Leaders —a simple 5-minute tool designed to help leaders challenge assumptions, identify missing information, verify conclusions, and make better decisions before acting on AI-generated recommendations. Download the free AI Verification Checklist for Leaders and start asking better questions before making important decisions.