Who's Responsible for Employee Success?
Cathie Leimbach • July 15, 2020
This is a subtitle for your new post
When I facilitate client meetings, every person in the room shares their perspective on the matter at hand and contributes ideas of how to move forward. Managers are often shocked at the positive energy and quality of input from their staff. Why are so many leaders, managers, and supervisors unaware of their staff’s potential and their value to the organization?
One reason is that few managers ask questions. There is a tendency for supervisors to give their staff day-by-day, or even hour-by-hour, specific instructions on what to do next, or they leave their staff alone to figure everything out by themselves. Few managers invest a lot of time using an intermediate approach. Daily or weekly two-way conversations between staff members and supervisors are relatively uncommon. Without such discussions, supervisors are unaware of their staff’s strengths and interests so can’t leverage their potential.
And, when staff don’t interact with others at work, they don’t feel valued. Their enthusiasm and productivity drop. Then, managers get frustrated with employee apathy and mediocre productivity.
Leaders push staff to work harder. Staff complain that managers aren't helpful or expectations aren't clear. Decades of Gallup research has revealed that the staff's assessment of the problem is pretty accurate. 70% of the factors that contribute to disappointing morale, engagement, productivity, and profit are the responsibility of managers.
So, what is the root cause of mediocre organizational outcomes? IT’S THE MANAGER!
Effective managers have servant hearts. They develop the skills needed to help their staff be the best they can be. They manage by asking questions that inspire great conversations and by becoming competent in the fifteen core skills of effective management. Unfortunately, this description of an effective manager does not describe the majority of managers.
What will you do this week to move beyond average? What is your next step to becoming a manager who leads with excellence and develops a healthy, high performance workplace team?
Most leaders know they should give feedback. Yet many avoid it. Not because they don't care, but because they worry they'll discourage someone, create conflict, or say the wrong thing. Unfortunately, when feedback is delayed, vague, or avoided, employees don't feel supported—they feel uncertain. Research highlighted in a recent McKinsey Quarterly article found that employees who receive regular, specific feedback are significantly more engaged than those who don't. The problem isn't that employees dislike feedback. They dislike feedback that feels judgmental, unclear, or disconnected from their growth. The strongest leaders understand something important: Feedback isn't a download. It's a dialogue. When leaders approach feedback as an employee development conversation rather than a list of mistakes, people become more open to hearing hard truths and more motivated to improve. Effective feedback communicates two powerful messages at the same time: I respect you. I believe you can grow. That combination changes everything. The best leaders don't simply evaluate past performance; they help employees see future potential. Rather than focusing only on what went wrong, they provide feedforward —guidance on what someone can do to become even more successful. High-performing organizations understand a simple truth: Improvement requires input. The question for leaders isn't whether to give feedback. It's whether our feedback leaves people feeling smaller—or stronger. Feedback doesn't change people. Better conversations do. Download our one-page guide: 5 Practices That Turn Feedback Into Growth Learn five practical ways to make every feedback conversation more productive, more encouraging, and more likely to inspire lasting growth. Conversation is where leadership happens
Most leaders want better performance. They want employees who take ownership, meet expectations, solve problems, and continue growing. Yet many leaders seldom initiate performance conversations – and when they do, it doesn’t go well. Leaders often hesitate because they fear discouraging people. Employees, meanwhile, don't know if they are missing the target. This can be costly. Research highlighted in McKinsey's Courageous Conversations article found that organizations with strong performance practices are four times more likely to outperform their peers. Yet fewer than one-third of employees believe performance reviews actually help them improve. The problem is not just a lack of performance conversations. It's a lack of clarity. The article points to a simple but powerful distinction: separate the hardware of performance from the software of performance. The hardware includes facts, goals, KPIs, commitments, timelines, and standards. The software includes tone, timing, relationships, empathy, and intent. When leaders clearly explain the facts while delivering them with care and respect, employees become more receptive to improvement. Strong leaders don't judge people—they diagnose work. They focus on behaviors, actions, and results rather than character. They clarify expectations, provide coaching, and create frequent opportunities for alignment. In high-performing cultures, clarity isn't viewed as criticism. It is viewed as support. As the article notes, "Clarity is a kindness, and ambiguity is a burden." Employees deserve to know where they stand, what success looks like, and how to improve. When leaders provide that clarity with dignity and respect, performance conversations become growth conversations. And growth is where better results begin. Download the Performance Conversations: Hardware & Software Checklist for Leaders and learn how to have everyday performance discussions that include opportunities for growth, accountability, and stronger results.