Communicate Your Assumptions

Cathie Leimbach • June 17, 2020

Synergy is a great benefit of effective teamwork. By drawing on each other’s strengths and experiences, the group generally achieves more than if they had worked separately.

Teams may get their best results when:

  • the team goals are clearly communicated,
  • the team members share their resources, knowledge, and ideas with each other,
  • team members listen to each other and ask clarifying questions, and
  • every team member is engaged in the discussion process.

When there are differences of opinion in a group, there can be a tendency to sweep the ‘elephant’ under the carpet. The big touchy subject is put aside and, on the surface, life goes on as if there is nothing to discuss. This can lead to undercurrents with uneasy whispers causing angst and damaging morale. We may fear that opening ‘the can of worms’ will cause a dangerous explosion that could increase the workplace tension.

How can team members surface their different perspectives so they understand where each other is coming from without lighting a fuse? Many teams schedule a simulation activity which requires them to complete an unfamiliar group task, develop a strategy together, and debrief their process and results. During the simulation, individuals tend to behave in a way that mirrors their normal approach. The group discussion yields insights into our own and other’s habits and positions us to work together more effectively. We may even become comfortable addressing ‘the elephant in the room’.

Arrange for a group at your workplace to participate in a simulation such as ‘The Search for the Lost Dutchman’s Gold Mine™’. You will come away with a list of insights to improve both your workplace productivity and your job satisfaction.

By Cathie Leimbach July 14, 2026
Most leaders know they should give feedback. Yet many avoid it. Not because they don't care, but because they worry they'll discourage someone, create conflict, or say the wrong thing. Unfortunately, when feedback is delayed, vague, or avoided, employees don't feel supported—they feel uncertain. Research highlighted in a recent McKinsey Quarterly article found that employees who receive regular, specific feedback are significantly more engaged than those who don't. The problem isn't that employees dislike feedback. They dislike feedback that feels judgmental, unclear, or disconnected from their growth. The strongest leaders understand something important: Feedback isn't a download. It's a dialogue. When leaders approach feedback as an employee development conversation rather than a list of mistakes, people become more open to hearing hard truths and more motivated to improve. Effective feedback communicates two powerful messages at the same time: I respect you. I believe you can grow. That combination changes everything. The best leaders don't simply evaluate past performance; they help employees see future potential. Rather than focusing only on what went wrong, they provide feedforward —guidance on what someone can do to become even more successful. High-performing organizations understand a simple truth: Improvement requires input. The question for leaders isn't whether to give feedback. It's whether our feedback leaves people feeling smaller—or stronger. Feedback doesn't change people. Better conversations do. Download our one-page guide: 5 Practices That Turn Feedback Into Growth Learn five practical ways to make every feedback conversation more productive, more encouraging, and more likely to inspire lasting growth. Conversation is where leadership happens
By Cathie Leimbach July 7, 2026
Most leaders want better performance. They want employees who take ownership, meet expectations, solve problems, and continue growing. Yet many leaders seldom initiate performance conversations – and when they do, it doesn’t go well. Leaders often hesitate because they fear discouraging people. Employees, meanwhile, don't know if they are missing the target. This can be costly. Research highlighted in McKinsey's Courageous Conversations article found that organizations with strong performance practices are four times more likely to outperform their peers. Yet fewer than one-third of employees believe performance reviews actually help them improve. The problem is not just a lack of performance conversations. It's a lack of clarity. The article points to a simple but powerful distinction: separate the hardware of performance from the software of performance. The hardware includes facts, goals, KPIs, commitments, timelines, and standards. The software includes tone, timing, relationships, empathy, and intent. When leaders clearly explain the facts while delivering them with care and respect, employees become more receptive to improvement. Strong leaders don't judge people—they diagnose work.  They focus on behaviors, actions, and results rather than character. They clarify expectations, provide coaching, and create frequent opportunities for alignment. In high-performing cultures, clarity isn't viewed as criticism. It is viewed as support. As the article notes, "Clarity is a kindness, and ambiguity is a burden." Employees deserve to know where they stand, what success looks like, and how to improve. When leaders provide that clarity with dignity and respect, performance conversations become growth conversations. And growth is where better results begin. Download the Performance Conversations: Hardware & Software Checklist for Leaders and learn how to have everyday performance discussions that include opportunities for growth, accountability, and stronger results.