Which Leadership Values Limit Your Success?

Cathie Leimbach • October 15, 2020

This is a subtitle for your new post

As a leader, I have been guilty of limiting the organization's or team's success by violating Stephen R Covey’s second habit, “begin with the end in mind”.


When I have a vague idea of what I want to achieve, my systematic brain starts listing the tasks and possible ways to get there. When it is clear that I have bitten off more than I can chew, I may delegate pieces and step-by-step processes to others. And the struggle begins. 


My team members are usually high capacity people. They can think on their own. They can often use their creativity and strengths to get the work done more effectively than I would have.


But, if I don’t accurately describe what I want them to achieve, there is confusion instead of clarity. If I challenge them to see which person can come up with the best plan to get the work done, I encourage internal competition instead of collaboration. And if I examine their progress several times a day and make little changes that don’t even improve the finished product, they will be groaning about micromanagement rather than feeling empowered to put their best foot forward.


I have also had experiences in leading healthy, high performance teams. In these situations, every team member enhances their competence, utilizing more and more of their potential. I have seen these outcomes when I encouraged clarity, collaboration, and empowerment.


By engaging the full team in discussions about our goals, everyone understands the desired results. Once there is clarity about where the team is headed, team members can collaborate on how to achieve the goals, considering several approaches, developing consensus on the best ones, and assigning roles that leverage each person’s strengths. Everyone now feels trusted to achieve the goals and empowered to make adjustments to the plan along the way. This leads to a healthier, happier, more successful workplace.


Yet, it is common for employees to experience confusion, internal competition, and micromanagement. Few managers regularly provide clarity, reward collaboration, or encourage empowerment. Most leaders have no training in leading people and they aren’t intentional about their leadership practices. Although employees generally wish to add meaningful value at work, their leaders often crush their spirit and initiative, preventing them from reaching their potential.


How can you improve your leadership style so you don’t hold your team members, your team, your organization, and yourself back?


Click here to learn about the "Breakthrough to Inspired Leadership" program which equips managers with the skills to lead people effectively. 

By Cathie Leimbach June 30, 2026
Most workplace tension doesn't come from major conflicts. It comes from too few conversations. A disappointment that was never discussed. A broken agreement that was never repaired. Appreciation that was never expressed. Over time, these "withholds" create friction that slows collaboration, weakens trust, and makes even simple conversations feel difficult. The strongest teams don't avoid tension—they address it early. Research highlighted in a recent McKinsey article found that unresolved tensions can significantly reduce team effectiveness, while high-trust teams consistently outperform their peers. The difference isn't the absence of problems. It's the willingness to talk about them. One of the most practical leadership habits is creating regular opportunities for transparent interaction. That includes appreciation. People should hear what they're doing well far more often than they hear about their shortfalls. Specific, genuine recognition builds trust over time. Those trust deposits matter because once positive relationships are built, difficult conversation are more likely to accept the message . When correction is needed, reinforce that you value the person, even though they aren’t perfect. The goal is growth, not judgment. But leaders should be careful not to make appreciation transactional. If positive feedback has been absent for months, suddenly offering praise immediately before a critique usually feels insincere. Trust is built through a steady pattern of recognition, encouragement, and honest conversation—not a last-minute compliment. Transparent leaders also address issues early. Small frustrations become large resentments when left unresolved. Teams that clear the air quickly spend less energy managing tension and more energy producing results. The result? Less friction. More trust. Stronger relationships. Better performance. Because healthy conversations don't just solve problems—they strengthen the team. Free Leader Guide: 5 Practices for Trust-Building Conversations The best leaders don't wait for tension to become conflict. They build trust before it's needed. Download our 5 Practices for Trust-Building Conversations guide to learn practical ways to strengthen relationships, reduce friction, and create a culture where honest conversations lead to better performance. Download the guide and start building trust one conversation at a time.
By Cathie Leimbach June 23, 2026
Most leaders say they want employees to speak up. They want people who spot risks, question assumptions, and help the organization make better decisions. Yet many employees hesitate to do exactly that. Why? Because leaders often respond to speaking up as if the speaker is complaining, criticizing or resisting. When people fear being viewed as difficult, they stop sharing what they see. The organization loses valuable information, ideas, and perspectives. A recent McKinsey article found that teams with high psychological safety are two to three times more likely to generate breakthrough ideas. When people feel safe speaking up, better thinking follows. The best leaders understand a simple truth: Speaking up is not defiance. It's duty. When employees question assumptions, raise concerns, or offer a different perspective, they are helping the team avoid blind spots and make stronger decisions. That's why effective leaders don't merely tolerate speaking up—they invite it. They ask: What are we not seeing? What assumptions are we making? Who might see this differently? What information are we missing? Just as importantly, they respond with curiosity instead of defensiveness. They thank people for expressing their perspective. They explain how input influenced decisions. They make speaking up safe. Because organizations don't improve when everyone agrees. They improve when people feel responsible for helping the team see what others may have missed. In healthy organizations, speaking up isn't rebellion. It's responsibility. It's duty. Leadership Reflection Think about your last leadership team meeting. Did people simply agree? Or did someone help the team see something it otherwise would have missed? Download 5 Questions That Surface Better Thinking and make speaking up a productive part of how your team thinks, decides, and performs.