Improving Team Productivity by 50%

Cathie Leimbach • October 1, 2020

This is a subtitle for your new post

A leadership coach friend of mine, recently helped a client increase his department's productivity by 50%. The process was simple.


The department supervisor needed an urgent solution. Since his two staff members had started working remotely, their productivity had slipped a lot. They weren't keeping up with client needs. Their output had to be turned around, and now!


My coaching friend advised the supervisor that employee productivity is based on skill, will, and capacity. If their skills and capacity support strong performance, the bottleneck is likely their will, their interest in doing the job.


When we enjoy our workplace tasks we are self-motivated to get them done and do them well. However, we have a limited amount of will power. We can only push ourselves for long to do work that doesn't inspire us, even if we have the skills and the capacity for excellence. We cannot simply suck it up and move forward.



The supervisor asked his staff to share which parts of the department's work they would they like to be doing. Both indicated a preference for many of the tasks the other was assigned. When the supervisor reassigned their responsibilities, productivity promptly increased by 50%.


A serious problem was solved by the supervisor having collaborative conversations with his staff. Poor productivity wasn't a training problem nor a wrong-hire problem. It was an emotional problem. Once the employees were responsible for tasks they liked doing, their productivity skyrocketed.


The clients are now being served well and the company's bottom line has improved.


The supervisor had caused the bottleneck by not knowing what made his employees tick. What is frustrating you at work? How might a collaborative conversation with your downline or your upline be a valuable tool towards enhancing your workplace satisfaction and productivity?

Speaking Up Is Not Defiance. It's Duty.

By Cathie Leimbach • June 23, 2026
Most leaders say they want employees to speak up. They want people who spot risks, question assumptions, and help the organization make better decisions. Yet many employees hesitate to do exactly that. Why? Because leaders often respond to speaking up as if the speaker is complaining, criticizing or resisting. When people fear being viewed as difficult, they stop sharing what they see. The organization loses valuable information, ideas, and perspectives. A recent McKinsey article found that teams with high psychological safety are two to three times more likely to generate breakthrough ideas. When people feel safe speaking up, better thinking follows. The best leaders understand a simple truth: Speaking up is not defiance. It's duty. When employees question assumptions, raise concerns, or offer a different perspective, they are helping the team avoid blind spots and make stronger decisions. That's why effective leaders don't merely tolerate speaking up—they invite it. They ask: What are we not seeing? What assumptions are we making? Who might see this differently? What information are we missing? Just as importantly, they respond with curiosity instead of defensiveness. They thank people for expressing their perspective. They explain how input influenced decisions. They make speaking up safe. Because organizations don't improve when everyone agrees. They improve when people feel responsible for helping the team see what others may have missed. In healthy organizations, speaking up isn't rebellion. It's responsibility. It's duty. Leadership Reflection Think about your last leadership team meeting. Did people simply agree? Or did someone help the team see something it otherwise would have missed? Download 5 Questions That Surface Better Thinking and make speaking up a productive part of how your team thinks, decides, and performs.

Put Your Brain in Gear When Using AI

By Cathie Leimbach • June 16, 2026
Artificial Intelligence is becoming a powerful workplace tool. It can summarize information, analyze data, draft content, and generate ideas in seconds. But there is a growing risk leaders need to recognize: AI can sound convincing even when it is wrong. In an article by Erica Dhawan, she describes a legal case where attorneys used ChatGPT to help prepare a court filing. The brief looked professional, the reasoning seemed logical, and the citations appeared legitimate. There was only one problem: several of the cited cases did not exist. The AI had fabricated them. The danger wasn't carelessness. It was trust. Because the information was presented clearly, confidently, and professionally, nobody stopped to question it. Psychologists call this the "fluency heuristic"—our tendency to assume information is accurate when it is easy to process and sounds credible. As leaders, we cannot allow polished answers to replace critical thinking. When you find yourself thinking, "This is too good to be true," put your brain in gear. Dig deeper. Investigate. Verify the facts. Ask what assumptions were made, what information might be missing, and what evidence supports the conclusion. AI can be an incredible assistant. It should never become a substitute for judgment. The smooth answer is not always the wrong one—but it is often the one that deserves the most scrutiny. Before You Act, Verify. The biggest risk with AI isn't bad information. It's believable information that's wrong. That's why we created the AI Verification Checklist for Leaders —a simple 5-minute tool designed to help leaders challenge assumptions, identify missing information, verify conclusions, and make better decisions before acting on AI-generated recommendations. Download the free AI Verification Checklist for Leaders and start asking better questions before making important decisions.